Randomized 36-month Follow-up of Posterior Bulk-Filled Resin Composite Restorations

Welcome to the best dentist in billings mt.

Methods

The BF technique showed clinical performance, which was comparable during the 36-month of clinical evaluation together using all the IF and it was not influenced by the strategy that was glue. Utilizing the ER approach reduces the risk of several marginal discoloration.
Supply: Journal of Dentistry
Author(s): A.D. Loguercio, M. Rezende, M.F. Gutierrez Reyes, T.F. Costa, A. Armas-Veja, A. Reis

Abstract
Goal

Following 36-month, 14, 21 and 33 restorations showed minor fractures, marginal desadaptation and color mismatch, respectively (p >0.05). Thirty-three restorations revealed some marginal discoloration following 36-month with important difference between ER (3 to ER-IF; 3 for ER-BF) and SE (14 for SE-IF; 12 for SE-BF; de <0.05).

Publication date: Available online 14 May 2019

Decision
Outcomes

The substance showed excellent clinical behaviour compared to the use in a incremental filling technique when associated after 3 years of evaluation to adhesive material.
Posterior dental cavities of 72 participants (n =236), using a cavity thickness of at least 3 mm, were divided into four classes. The restorations were secured using either the Tetric N-Bond ER or even Tetric N-Bond SE. The resin Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill was set either IF or utilizing BF. Two seasoned and calibrated examiners assessed the restorations with FDI standards and after 12, 24 and 36-month. The statistical analyses were conducted with the Wilcoxon Signed rank test (α =0.05)

Clinical significance

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *